← Table of Contents Appendix E of 7

Appendix E — Dependency Table and Scenario Planning

This appendix maps all 51 chapters to historical era, difficulty, prerequisites, and unlocks, then replaces the former universal rebuild schedule with scenario-dependent planning bands. These bands are not forecasts or critical-path dates.

E.1 Chapter Dependency Table

Chapters 1–47 form the core manual. Chapters 48–51 are an optional defense annex and are excluded from the core planning graph.

Ch Title (short) Historical development band Difficulty Requires Unlocks
1 Fire ~400 kya low — 2, 5, 7, heat everywhere
2 Toolkit paleolithic mid 1 3, 4, 6
3 Cordage/textiles upper paleolithic low 2 4, 6, 8, belts/sails
4 Food acquisition/preservation mesolithic low–mid 2, 3 surplus → 7, 9
5 Pottery ~20 kya low–mid 1 storage → 7, crucibles → 10/14
6 Shelter/settlement neolithic low–mid 2, 3, 5 granaries, villages
7 Agriculture ~10 kya mid 1, 5, 6 population engine
8 Animals/draft ~12 kya mid 3, 4, 7 traction, manure loop
9 Trade/money bronze age low–mid 7, 8 specialization at scale
10 Copper/bronze ~5000 BCE mid 1, 2, 5; basic surface ore selection furnace skills; industrial mining
11 Writing ~3200 BCE low–mid 9 administration, 12, 18
12 Math 3000 BCE–1700 CE mid 11 engineering cognition
13 Mining ~4000 BCE mid 1, 2, 5, 6 industrial 10/14; 21/28 feedstock
14 Iron/steel craft ~1200 BCE mid–high 1, 2, 5, 10, 13 15 precision tools; 22 scale-up
15 Mechanisms/lathe ancient→1800 mid 12, 14 machine culture
16 Mills ~300 BCE–1200 CE mid 3, 14, 15 proto-industry power
17 Craft chemistry ancient→1600s mid 5, 13 19 optics; 21 industrial chemistry; 30/31 hygiene
18 Printing 1450s mid 11, 15, 16 knowledge cost collapse
19 Optics 1280→1670s mid 12, 15, 17 astronomy/microscopy
20 Instruments/method 1600→1900 mid–high 15, 17, 18, 19 21+ measurement and method
21 Powder/acids 850→1860s mid–high 13, 17 mining + heavy chemicals
22 Coke iron 1709→1850s mid–high 14, 13, 16 cheap metal era
23 Steam engines 1698→1900s high 22, 15, 20 power anywhere
24 Canals/roads/rails ancient→1900 mid 23, 22, 9 national markets
25 Electricity I 1745→1866 mid–high 15, 17, 20 electromagnetism mastery
26 Electricity II/grids 1866→1900 high 25, 23, 22 universal power socket
27 Steel/concrete 1856→1950s high 22, 21, 20 structural abundance
28 Petroleum 1859→1940s high 13, 21, 23 transport fuels
29 ICE/vehicles 1876→1950s high 28, 27, 15 mobility revolution
30 Sanitation/germs 1847→1920s mid 17, 19, 20, 21 survivable cities
31 Clinical medicine 1846→1960s high 30, 21, 28 individual survival tech
32 Green Revolution 1909→1970s high 21, 29, 30 nitrogen wall broken
33 Flight 1853→1960s extreme 20, 27, 29; Ch 38 optional jump air transport/aerospace path
34 Vacuum-tube electronics 1887→1950s high 25, 26, 17 signal shaping concepts
35 Transistors/ICs 1947→1971+ extreme 20, 21, 34 computation collapse
36 Computers/software 1854→1980s extreme 18, 35 thought automation
37 Fission 1896→1980s extreme 20, 27, 13 dense power/isotopes
38 Polymers/composites 1839→present high 21, 26, 28, 35 materials catalog
39 Rocketry/orbit 1926→present extreme 20, 27, 29, 36, 38 space access
40 Satellites 1957→present extreme 39, 34, 35 planetary nervous system
41 Fiber optics 1966→present high 17, 26, 34, 35 bandwidth civilization
42 Internet/cloud 1969→present extreme 26, 36, 41 real-time coordination
43 Energy portfolio 1954→present high 26, 35, 37 abundance pricing
44 Biotech 1865→present extreme 30, 31, 35 read-write genome
45 Robotics 1788→present high 15, 35, 36, 43 labor automation
46 Machine intelligence 1958→present extreme 12, 35, 42 domain automation/cognition infrastructure
47 Institutions 1300→present high 9, 11, 12 scale itself
48 Fortification/siegecraft ~8000 BCE→20th c. mid 6, 13, 21 state fiscal systems
49 Gunpowder weapons 10th c. China→20th c. mid–high 21, 14/27, 15 industrial war; armory precision
50 Naval power Salamis→present high 3, 17/21, 23/24, 34/35 global projection
51 Industrial war/org tech 1590s drill→present high 9, 11/47, 24, 49 modern state capacity itself

E.2 Scenario-Dependent Planning Model

A calendar is not a dependency analysis. The same technology can take one generation or several depending on population, resources, institutions, education, finance, war, famine, climate, and whether the knowledge survives. The former single “500-year” estimate assumed a large starting population and competent governance while claiming no inherited industry—conditions that already contain major social capital.

This edition therefore provides scenario bands, exit evidence, and bottleneck categories rather than universal dates.

Scenario-dependent planning model instead of a universal 500-year schedule Fig E.1 — Start scale and local bottlenecks determine elapsed time SETTLEMENT · 10k–50k target: survival + local repair bottlenecks: specialists, reserves output: resilient settlement REGIONAL · 50k–500k target: workshops + trade bottlenecks: power, tools, finance output: regional industry INDUSTRIAL · 1m+ target: cities + advanced systems bottlenecks: scale, energy, research output: industrial civilisation Advance only when an acceptance gate passes—not because a bar on a chart says the date arrived. Any model must be rerun after war, famine, epidemic, migration, resource discovery, or institutional failure. Elapsed years are an output of the scenario model, never an input hidden inside it.
Figure E.1. The manual now starts from a declared population, resource, and institutional scenario. Each scenario has a different target and different binding constraints.

E.2.1 Planning inputs

Every schedule must state:

E.2.2 Bottleneck categories

Bottleneck Typical symptom Evidence needed
Population and food specialists cannot be sustained through bad seasons reliable reserves, productivity, labour and age data
Tacit skill apprentices can copy objects but not diagnose variation supervised production, measured yield, qualified teachers
Energy machinery exists but cannot run continuously reliable fuel, power, heat, maintenance, storage
Materials one ore, grade, or supplier blocks production qualified alternatives, strategic stock, substitution test
Measurement parts and processes cannot be compared traceable standards, instruments, calibration records
Institutions projects fund construction but not maintenance named owner, lifecycle budget, audit, succession
Public health labour loss and contamination rise water, waste, disease, vaccination, cold-chain evidence
Information knowledge is copied but not validated archive, edition control, independent test and revision
Safety accidents are treated as isolated bad luck hazard register, controls, incident learning, independent review
Environment resource base or system output degrades measured flows, limits, restoration and substitution plans

E.2.3 Gate record

At each capability gate, record:

  1. current output and uncertainty;
  2. next acceptance test;
  3. hard prerequisite;
  4. named responsible organisation;
  5. workforce and competence requirement;
  6. material and energy budget;
  7. maintenance interval;
  8. failure and recovery plan;
  9. independent review date;
  10. scenario assumptions that would invalidate the plan.

E.2.4 What can still be estimated responsibly

A project planner may estimate duration for a specific scenario using:

The result should be a range with scenarios, not a single date. A useful model answers: “Under these assumptions, which capability is the next binding constraint, and what evidence would change the answer?” It does not convert incomplete knowledge into a universal timetable.

E.3 Planning Record Template

Field Current value Evidence Confidence Owner Review date
Scenario
Highest complete gate
Next gate
Binding constraint
Acceptance test
Safety / environmental review
Failure recovery
Estimated duration range
Assumptions to test

FIRE TO FUTURE — A Field Manual for Rebuilding Technology · Download PDF